@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org Yeah, that has nothing to do with fun. š
I was thinking back to CD players. Switching tracks took a moment, although I donāt know anymore how long exactly. IIRC, playing CDs on a computer was a bit slower than in a dedicated player.
Donāt worry, switching to the next OGG file on my disk is basically instant. š
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org But stuff is still āmostly usableā, isnāt it? Itās not like it became impossible to write a letter because everything has gotten so slow.
Thatās what I meant by āabsoluteā performance: A human being tolerates a system boot up time of 0.5-2 minutes, for example, so thereās an absolute/fixed duration that any task is allowed to take. Boot: 0.5-2 minutes. Opening Word: 1-10 seconds. Saving an image file: 1-10 seconds. Time until the next song starts to play when you click ānext trackā: 0-5 seconds. Stuff like that. As long as we donāt exceed those durations, people will be more or less happy.
Wasted potential? Ab-so-fucken-lutely.
(Maybe Iām repeating myself. Iām tired. Sorry. š )
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org Uhh, nice. Havenāt seen a sunset like that in a while, I think. š¤
What the heck is going on here today, so many messages. š
@prologic@twtxt.net ā¦ what was that again? š¤š š¤Ŗ
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org I guess itās all about āabsoluteā performance. Everything is just fast enough for you to get stuff done ā no matter the underlying machine. LibreOffice today on my modern machine takes the same time to start up as StarOffice (its ancestor) on my retro machine. And working with it feels the same, everything is just as fast (or slow).
Browsing the web today feels similar to 25 years ago. Even all this wobbling that my link above demonstrates already existed back then (in a way), but it was caused by images loading so slowly. Then, for a brief moment, some browser (I donāt remember which one) had this brilliant feature of trying to keep the current scrolling position stable while the page was still loading. That was great. š This feature then got lost again, probably because itās too hard to do with JavaScript changing the DOM all the time. So now weāre back to the way it was before.
Corporations should give devs the slowest and oldest machines that they have. š Not only would this be more sustainable, it would also force them to optimize better.
Wayland wants to make every frame perfect. I wish web devs had the same goal. Instead, weāre stuck with this:
https://movq.de/v/112a927861/hiccupfx/
šš
@prologic@twtxt.net Most of the things that cause my frustration are things that I canāt change or even avoid. Thereās little benefit in complaining about it, I think. š¤
Iām putting all efforts to switch to Wayland on hold for another 2 years, minimum.
As we all know, writing a Wayland compositor from scratch is next to impossible. Luckily, thereās the wlroots project which aims to build a base library for this task. Basically every compositor except for GNOME and KDE uses it. (This is good! The less fragmentation, the better.)
wlroots is still very volatile, lots of changes with every release. Downstream users (i.e., the projects that write the actual compositor) have to constantly āchaseā changes in wlroots. dwl, my favorite compositor at the moment, has recently switched their main
branch to target the wlroots git version instead of the latest release. My understanding is that they have to do this in order to keep up with wlroots (maybe Iām wrong).
Everything is volatile and a moving target.
Why does any of this matter for me? Because I have to eventually fork dwl or at least keep a patch set, and I donāt have the stamina to constantly fiddle with this stuff. Iām running my own X11 window manager, itās highly specialized, and using just āsome Wayland compositor out thereā is a huge step backward that Iām not willing to take. I tried, itās just painful and annoying with zero benefits.
So ā¦ it was fun experimenting with Wayland a bit, but Iām now back to waiting for things to settle down considerably.
@prologic@twtxt.net @lyse@lyse.isobeef.org Itās better this way. š I donāt like all this negativity in tech. We tend to focus on bad aspects too much, imho. Then again, itās really easy to focus on bad stuff, simply because thereās so much of it. š
Today is one of those days where Iām really grumpy and have typed out lots and lots of rants. Luckily, I all deleted them in the end instead of sending them. š
@prologic@twtxt.net They all gave Crowdstrike root access to their machines. What could possibly go wrong? š¤·š¤·š¤·
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org Oh, ok, somehow I thought this was not your thing. š
Maybe I was misled by you calling them āAcca Daccaā, which felt somewhat derogative. But I just found @mckinley@mckinley.ccās twt gaapgna
from a while ago ā so this is just normal Aussie slang for AC/DC?! š¤Æš„“
@eldersnake@we.loveprivacy.club
I run it in a Work profile on my GrapheneOS phone that I can switch off at any time
Hmmmmmmm, I like that idea. If I could ban WhatsApp into a second profile and only switch it on every now and then, I would feel a little bit better about it.
(I donāt really trust Android, though, and I suspect that apps can still install background services that are always active. Pure speculation and paranoid on my part, but still.)
@mckinley@twtxt.net Hmmmmm, yeah, sounds like jabber is not the right thing for us then.
@aelaraji@aelaraji.com To be honest, I donāt like Matrix that much myself. We donāt use any of the fancy crypto features and all that, no federation either. And clients like āFluffyChatā look and feel pretty much like any other chat client. Itās a rather simple setup. Problem is just that itās not WhatsApp and people want WhatsApp, nothing else. š«¤ (Hence I have little hope that Signal would be a big success.)
Anyone who reads the CrowdStrike self-description and then buys the product has really earned a major fault.
The nasty thing is: Sysadmins donāt decide this, do they? The management does. And they donāt have to clean up this bloody fucking mess.
All the fellow sysadmins who were hit by this have my sympathies. š
@prologic@twtxt.net Everythingās on fire. Weāre going to be complaining for a couple of days, then weāll continue as usual, repeating the same mistakes. Nothing to see, carry on. š«¤š„“
(Iām just glad it didnāt affect us at work.)
Then there comes in feature creep.
This is driving me nuts. Everybody thinks that ādevelopment has to be kept alive!ā When people see a project without commits in the last 2 years, they think itās dead and not worth using. Bah, why? Software can be ādoneā. If no bugs are known, then thereās no need to change anything.
All these ideas are old. Iāve heard about much of this from meillo some 15 years ago and he didnāt come up with it, either.
Itās all super unpopular. Why? Many of my projects see a burst of commits in the beginning and then mostly just maintenance ā and thatās great. It saves me from so much trouble and work. For example, my X11 wallpaper setter was written in 2017, Iām using it daily all the time, it just works, boom, done.
A project isnāt dead if it doesnāt see commits anymore ā itās dead if nobody maintains it anymore.
@mckinley@twtxt.net Last time I tried jabber was probably 10 years ago. Howās group chat these days? Is it comparable to āmodernā chat systems, does it feel the same?
I guess itās irrelevant which platform Iām going to propose as an alternative to WhatsApp. Itās the same old problem: Almost all their contacts are on WhatsApp, so thatās what they want to use, end of story.
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org You had me in the first half, I thought you were going to their concert. š That would have surprised me.
I had some pleasant experiences with public transportation lately, but that wasnāt Deutsche Bahn.
Would a bike or an ebike be an alternative for you? š¤
@prologic@twtxt.net @bender@twtxt.net Itās a twtxt feed that anyone can post to via Gopher: gopher://g.nixers.net/1/%7eanon/
Do we think this is a problem? š¤ If so, you should be able to contact the admin in #nixers on libera.chat.
@prologic@twtxt.net Kind of, yeah. (I wish they wouldnāt focus so much on āelitismā.)
Regarding complexity budget, slow software, all that:
Very few people do take pride in building simple, elegant, high-quality systems, do they? Why is that? Why are huge shiny things with tons of features more attractive? š¤
I never explicitly thought about this, to be honest. It was only at the back of my head. And I never tried to teach our younger āstudentsā at work: āHey, itās a great achievement to build something simple and elegant. Thatās something to be proud of!ā
Worse, simple software is often described as āboringā. Yes, in a way, it is boring, because your brain doesnāt have to get into overdrive to understand it. But thatās exactly the point. And itās hard to achieve that! Simple software isnāt just āfewer lines of codeā, you have to be pretty clever to solve a problem in a simple and elegant way. So itās something to be proud of.
Could this be an intuitive, emotional way to get more people on board the āsimple softwareā-train? š¤
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org Yeah, youāre right. The quality aspect is lacking, too. Sigh. š
Focus on quality, focus on ādoing it rightā, make that your primary goal. And everything else shall fall into place.
If it only were that simple. š«¤š
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org Yeah, itās hard(er) with family members. I shouldnāt have started that Matrix stuff ā before that, they had an easier time accepting that I donāt use WhatsApp. Now itās more like āwhy donāt you switch?ā
āJoy of missing outā, eh? :D
@prologic@twtxt.net Iāll look into it. š¤ The good thing is that I think some people already use Signal. Weāll see.
If WhatsApp was just a messenger, I probably wouldnāt be so reluctant to join. But itās an app that insists on running on a smartphone. It has access to so much metadata ā¦ Fuck this shit. š«¤
The āMatrix Experimentā, i.e. running a Matrix server for our family, has failed completely and miserably. People donāt accept it. They attribute unrelated things to it, like āI canāt send messages to you, I donāt reach you! It doesnāt work!ā Yes, you do, I get those messages, I just donāt reply quickly enough because Iām at work or simply doing something else.
Iāll probably shut it down.
Nobody cares about privacy. The reasons I bring up in discussions are ātoo nerdyā. They put all their stuff to Google or Apple, so why would messaging be any different? (Weāre not even using all those Matrix crypto stuff ā¦ That would be insane.)
Itās a lost cause. Iām frustrated.
Will I give in and use WhatsApp instead? Not sure yet.
@prologic@twtxt.net Iām not smart/educated enough to come up with a formal spec. š¤
Itās somewhat telling that the HTMX blogpost also (mostly) only talks about feelings, not hard facts.
@prologic@twtxt.net How about ānowā? š
Personally, Iāve been doing this for a long time now. Minimal(-ish), slow pace, no pressure. Works quite well for me. The idea isnāt very popular, though. š„“
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org Awww, nice birdie. Lovely pic. š
We desperately need to start a Slow Software movement. High quality, intentionally designed, low defect software done at a quarter of the pace for the same price. Because weāve been destroying the mental health of developers for the last quarter century, and what do we have to show for it but a giant mess?
Maybe your softwares are just perfect and there are simply no bug reports and contributions required. :-)
Haha. š I guess my software is just way too irrelevant. š Or maybe not. I just donāt know. I should add some telemetry. š
I just also see the issue with smaller mail servers being blocked by the large ones. This also happened to me I believe. My mails just never made it to the people. Or they were ignored, I cannot tell.
To be honest, when I send private email, like insurance stuff or to the bank or similar, I always get a reply. The recipients are German mail servers, usually run by those institutions or individuals. Sometimes itās MS Outlook or Telekom. In other words, itās not Google. Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm ā¦
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org Is that an actual lake? And a fish? It looks so small. I always wonder how fish end up there. š¤
@prologic@twtxt.net Well ā¦ š
Should sit down and see what the contributions have been for some of my projects before and after the migration away from Github? š¤
I might do that for my projects. š¤
Maybe itās a discovery problem too?
Yeah, well, apart from my own blog and rarely Mastodon, I donāt really talk about my projects anymore. I used to mention them on forums and reddit and the likes. Forums were really good for that. But I mean, forums are dying out as well, so where do you āpromoteā your projects? š¤ On Mastodon, it usually gets drowned in the noise.
I sure hope not, that kind of defeats the point of an ecosystem that is suppose to encourage distributed software development and distributed forms of collaboration. Right? š¤
It does, yes. Question is, do people actually care about distributed development anymore? (Did they ever?)
@prologic@twtxt.net No, just a minor injury, as far as I know.
This sums up the Matrix experience: https://cathode.church/@apothecary/112742706806370926
I would never ask anyone to send me patches via Email.
Thatās not even what Iām doing, but I just realized that my bugs.html
page isnāt really clear about that. It implies that patches are meant to be sent via email and Iām fine if that happens ā but I donāt insist on people doing that. You might as well send me a link to your fork on GitHub or your own server or whatever.
I should clarify that. š¤
@prologic@twtxt.net Huh, okay, thatās surprising to me. I had thought that Gitea would be easy enough for people to use. I mean, it even has the āSign in with GitHubā button. š¤ And itās not like Gitea is some arcane/archaic tool like Bugzilla, which is just horrible to use.
So ā¦ whatās stopping people?
Iām not sure what else we can do? Iām nNOT moving back to Github, ever.
Same. There are alternatives like https://codeberg.org/ now, but does that really help? GitHub was also a small and independent platform once. Are we supposed to āforge hopā (as in ādistro hopā) all the time, migrate from the most non-shitty hoster to the next? That canāt be the solution.
@prologic@twtxt.net Someone shot at Trump: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cd1d31jeyzlo
I donāt run a bug tracker, instead all my projects link to this page:
https://uninformativ.de/bugs.html
It basically says, when you find a bug, please send me an email.
Now Iāve read this:
https://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/programming/EmailVsForgesUnfortunate
I hadnāt thought about this before. Thatās a quite valid reason. š«¤ Sadly, it applies to any truly independent self-hosted service. That OAuth thingy (āSign in with GitHubā) might be the only compromise ā¦
(I rarely get any feedback on my projects, btw. jenny might be an exception, because weāre talking about it here sometimes. Overall, the number of bug reports has dropped significantly since I moved away from GitHub.)
Jesus christ, America. š«¤
Trying to learn this on double bass now:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KCcf7GeBq-M
Too bad my electric double bass will never sound as majestic as an acoustic one.
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org Oh, absolutely. Doing crazy stuff is fun every now and then, but thereās no need to be masochistic. š
yarnd
that's cropped up that results in a " />
at the end of uploaded/links images. I'm not able to figure this bug out yet š¢
@prologic@twtxt.net Whatās the offending commit according to your bisect?
Speaking of programming languages, Iām so glad that Iāve spent so much time doing C and a little bit of Assembler over the years. Itās the perfect foundation for my recently acquired retrocomputing hobby. š You can target basically any platform with C ā DOS, OS/2, Windows NT, UNIX, ā¦ Had I gone all-in on Java (as University and employers nudged me to in the mid-2000ās), I probably wouldnāt have this skill set now. š¤
yarnd
that's cropped up that results in a " />
at the end of uploaded/links images. I'm not able to figure this bug out yet š¢
@prologic@twtxt.net Yeah, Iāve seen this for a while now. š¤
@prologic@twtxt.net Rust just isnāt the best tool for every job, even though thatās what the ācultā around it wants to make you believe.
Iām surprised that the article doesnāt talk about the ecosystem and the large number of dependencies that you usually pull in. š¤ Maybe the author is already used to that.
Yeah, weāre quite lucky with this very, very wet summer this year.
ā¦ unless youāre living in one of those areas with severe weather: https://www.tagesschau.de/inland/unwetter-sturm-hagel-100.html š š±
We had some lovely 15Ā°C this morning, too. Now at 20Ā°C. Letās hope it stays that way for a while.