In-reply-to » #215 - Newlines without Unicode - yarn - Mills -- We discussed the idea of changing the way we handle Newlines in Twts once upon a time, but nobody adopted it, we didn't amend the spec and really we just kept the existing spec as-is using the \2028 and simpler search/replace in place. Did we want to revisit this again in a potential Twtxt v2 spec rewrite, or are we happy with how this works? 🤔 cc @movq @lyse @tkanos (please add other client authors to this thread) #Twtxt #Spec #Multiline

@prologic@twtxt.net I don’t think the solution proposed there is a good one, and here are my reasons.

  1. The specification says quite clearly, “The file must be encoded with UTF-8”. If an old piece of software can’t handle UTF-8, it can’t produce a valid twtxt feed at all.

  2. I believe the intention behind this solution is to make it render in an acceptable fashion in clients that don’t support the convention, but I think it’s the opposite in reality. Separating posts like that could make it very frustrating to read in a feed. I would much rather have nothing or a replacement character separating logical lines.

  3. I think it interferes quite heavily with human readability for the same reason. When reading a twtxt feed, it’s helpful to know that each line with a timestamp represents one post.

⤋ Read More