@abucci@anthony.buc.ci You are right of course. I donāt think we can consider anything thus are to be remotely close to āintelligenceā, it actually frustrates me that we can call these fields āAIā, we should call them what they are, āmachine learningā, theyāre just fancy algorithms many of which are pretty good at āpattern matchingā.
As for what we define as āintelligenceā, fucked if I know š I doubt anyone else can define this either. I tend to believe that until we figure out how to create āsomethingā that can have a sense of self-awareness and self-growth and a way to expand and āreprogramā itself, weāll never get very far. Really āevolutionary lifeā simulations or āartificial life simulationsā are much closer I think.