↳
In-reply-to
»
@bender Is it so maxed out you couldn't fit a pretty small program like Headscale on it? Headscale by itself and only personal home type use as far as amount of peers go, it really isn't noticeable I don't think resource-wise. The Docker version I guess could be a different story.
⤋ Read More
@eldersnake@we.loveprivacy.club It’s only the Docker engine itself that consume a bit more memory which is responsible for managing containers on the host. There’s also a tiny bit of overhead with containerd too. which acts as the parent and supervisor of the container, but that’s pretty small.