↳ In-reply-to » I’m still more in favor of (replyto:…). It’s easier to implement and the whole edits-breaking-threads thing resolves itself in a “natural” way without the need to add stuff to the protocol.

@prologic@twtxt.net

Regarding the URL changing issue: That is not a new issue and not addressed by either PR. Do you have some plans to solve this that only works with hashes? 🤔 Is it feed signing? I have to admit here, I forgot most about the feed signing ideas. 🙈

• Twt Subjects lose their meaning
  

You mean existing threads in the past? Yeah.

• Twt Subjects cannot be verified without looking up the feed.
  
  • Which may or may not exist anymore or may change.
    

Not sure what you mean? 🤔 But yes, things can change (that’s the point).

• Two persons cannot reply to a Twt independently of each other anymore.
  

How so? 🤔 That would be a total show-stopper, I agree. But are you sure that’s going to happen? For example, if people were to reply to this very twt of yours, they would do this:

(replyto:https://twtxt.net/user/prologic/twtxt.txt,2024-09-21T15:22:18Z) foobar

Am I missing something?