↳
In-reply-to
»
@prologic I appreciate that you were trying to be civil. I do see that, and I thank you for that. And on second read, that last message might be a bit harsher than I intended. I’m sorry for that. I do think it’s clear to me that we’re not gonna get anywhere having a discussion in this format. I think I’m realizing this is a terrible medium for this sort of discussion. It creates a false urgency, at least for me. Maybe a long form blog post where commenters can reply in an email 1:1 would be better. I think it might allow everyone more time to allow their ideas to “bake” before sending.
⤋ Read More
@brasshopper@twtxt.net Thanks! 🙏 Again I’m sorry. One of the things I’m painfully aware of iw how “text” form (especially short-form) can be so misleading and intent misinterpreted. – Yes you’re probably right, short-form microBlogging such as Yarn/Twtxt is probably ill suited to “hard debates” like the one we just seemed to have 😅 – OTOH it can also be fine, this isn’t the first time “hot debate” has occurred in the Yarn/Twtxt ecosystem at large, sometimes they’ve gone on for days 😅