In-reply-to » @prologic To be fair, that both predates Sandstorm (circa 2014), and considering you've tried it recently and still spun up your own corporate infrastructure, demonstrates it's not ready to meet your needs even today.

@ocdtrekkie@twtxt.net I don’t need any bullet points really. It’s easy. Aside from all the things we already agree upon, like the backend being written in C++, the UI/UX is a bit well umm you know πŸ˜… (even my wife had something to say about it πŸ˜‚) – Bottom line though?

Sandstorm’s model is opposite of what I want/need.

An ideal version of Sandstorm would by one in which I can choose to operate an instance ine one of two models (multi-user or free-for-all or even single-user?). But the way Sandstorm is modelled today, its basically a C++ Web App with a poor UI that lets anyone basically run whatever they want and install whatever they want with (I admit) strong security based on Capability.

Problem is I really don’t need this kind of security, or at least if I do, I want to chose whether I need this level of security or not.

People (I mean ordinary) folk already find security inconvenience and hard enough as it is. They just don’t get Capability based Security, neither did I at first πŸ™„

​ Read More