↳
In-reply-to
»
@falsifian In my opinion it was a mistake that we defined the first
⤋ Read More
url field in the feed to define the URL for hashing. It should have been the last encountered one. Then, assuming append-style feeds, you could override the old URL with a new one from a certain point on:
@movq@www.uninformativ.de Peobably not and I wouldn’t expect them to either 😅