@david@daiwei.me It’s like Rummy but with more freedom which makes it a hell lot more interesting. You’re allowed to manipulate everything that’s on the table, trigger jokers, recombine the cards as long as there are at least three in a row after your move, not just simply add cards to existing rows (or whatever the correct terminology is). It’s good fun and mental exercise.

What next after vibe coding
One interesting possible future of the emergence of “vibe coding” as common terminology is the possibility to position an alternative.

“Real coding”?

Future think pieces:

• ‘You can get yourself up and running quickly with “vibe coding” but when you get traction you’re going to want have people doing “real coding”’

• ‘switching from vibe coding to real coding will typically cost you X% of you initial development, so don’t put off switching too late’

[Comments](https://lobste.rs/s/m … ⌘ Read more

@bender@twtxt.net Bahahah 🤣😂 mate, me and one of my SRE colleagues actually came up with the terminology ourselves! 😛

OAuth: “grant” vs “flow” vs “grant type”
Is it called an OAuth “grant” or a “flow”? What about “grant type”? ⌘ Read more

On my blog: Pejoratives and Specificity https://john.colagioia.net/blog/2022/12/04/specificity.html #blog #harm #rant #terminology

annoyance: terminology of “maximin”/“minimax” has some deep symmetry breaking

https://traditionsofconflict.com/blog/2019/10/4/sacred-metal, and now consider computer programming (especially the terminology of wizards/gurus, programming as magic, the SICP cover &c!)

On the blog: Words Are Hard, I Guess… https://john.colagioia.net/blog/2020/06/21/words.html #terminology #rant

So, what I normally call ‘command line’ (as opposed to ‘console’) Pike in the Acme paper called ‘typescript’, and I think it might be worth adopting that terminology. The way he defines it would also apply to notebook interfaces.