@thecanine@twtxt.net Wow. Iâm not an artist in any way, but I have tried to make icons for programs or fonts every now and then. Making something that is still recognizable at so few pixels is hard. Hats off!
Fonte: obviamente, Wikipédia
In 1996, they came up with the X11 âSECURITYâ extension:
https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/4w548u/what_is_up_with_the_x11_security_extension/
This is what could have (eventually) solved the security issues that weâre currently seeing with X11. Those issues are cited as one of the reasons for switching to Wayland.
That extension never took off. The person on reddit wonders why â I think itâs simple: Containers and sandboxes werenât a thing in 1996. It hardly mattered if X11 was âinsecureâ. If you could run an X11 client, you probably already had access to the machine and could just do all kinds of other nasty things.
Today, sandboxing is a thing. Today, this matters.
Iâve heard so many times that âX11 is beyond fixable, itâs hopeless.â I donât believe that. I believe that these problems are solveable with X11 and some devs have said âyeah, we could have kept working on itâ. Itâs that people donât want to do it:
Why not extend the X server?
Because for the first time we have a realistic chance of not having to do that.
https://wayland.freedesktop.org/faq.html
Iâm not in a position to judge the devs. Maybe the X.Org code really is so bad that you want to run away, screaming in horror. I donât know.
But all this was a choice. I donât buy the argument that we never would have gotten rid of things like core fonts.
All the toolkits and programs had to be ported to Wayland. A huge, still unfinished effort. If that was an acceptable thing to do, then it would have been acceptable to make an âX12â that keeps all the good things about X11, remains compatible where feasible, eliminates the problems, and requires some clients to be adjusted. (You could have still made âX11X12â like âXWaylandâ for actual legacy programs.)
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org The underlines are a bit much, yes. It appears to be related to my font (Helvetica) ⊠Maybe they do some Unicode trickery these days, I donât know. đ«€
These are lists in your Inkscape example, right?
The font stuff? Yeah, thatâs a scrollable list where you can select the current font.
@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org oh it wouldnât be very long, maybe thatâd make for a fun blog post! i just used the same tool that the nerd font people use to add glyphs, but for a âcustom glyph setâ i just added. the whole noto font LMAO
hacking jetbrains mono to include CJK characters from a noto font for stupid purposes (i listen to asian music and my conky sidebar has a lastfm widget so sometimes it shows asian text and jetbrains doesnât render those. so i am frankensteining my way into making it do that)
gamado Ă @aperture@aperture porque hĂĄ meses/anos que quero escrever um texto sobre esta postura, e esta imagem explica tĂŁo bem o problema
(fonte)
Once or twice a year, I make an effort to switch from dark mode / black terminals to light mode again.
It usually doesnât end well, because the contrast is just not as good. Thereâs a reason that things like professional DAWs or CAD software use a dark theme.
With a heavy bold font, itâs much better:
https://movq.de/v/331aa40bde/s.png
My font doesnât get any bolder than this, though. Iâd have to make a new variant of it. Mhh. đ€
@thecanine@twtxt.net My apologies, mate! :-( As @david@collantes.us pointed out, this was definitely not my intent at all.
For the easter egg hunt, I first looked for a hidden image map link on the pixel dog in the right lower corner itself. Maybe one giant pixel just links to somewhere else, I figured. But I couldnât find any and then quickly moved on. Hence, I naturally viewed the HTML source. Because where else would be a good hiding place for easter eggs, right?
Next, I noticed the <font>
tags. I thought I had read quite some time ago that they are not an HTML5 thing, but wasnât entirely sure about it. So, I asked the W3C HTML validator. Sure enough. I thought I let you know about the violations. If somebody had found a mistake on my site, Iâd love to hear about it, so I could fix it. Iâm sorry that my chosen form of report didnât resonate with you all that well. I reckoned youâll also find it a bit funny, but I was clearly very wrong on that.
I actually followed the dog cow link to the video, so I ended up on the easter egg. However, I didnât recognize it as such. ÂŻ_(ă)_/ÂŻ Oh well.
Regarding my message about the browser quirks: I read your answer that you were arguing against the HTML validator findings. Of course, everybody can do with their sites whatever they likes.
Nem Ă© preciso ir espreitar as notĂcias da #nintendo, a CiberlĂąndia Ă© a minha fonte
(aguardando pelos takes dos correspondentes @seyon, @RuteRadio e @ines@ines)
@thecanine@twtxt.net It suits your site very well, but I find this font hard to read. In any case, keep on pixeling.
Bela surpresa: agora o Twitter bloqueia o Firefox mobile. Ă uma boa notĂcia pra começar o dia, o espaço que ocupava na minha rotina de procrastinação pode ser agora dedicado a melhores fontes.
@prologic@twtxt.net I knew you were short sided from day one I saw Yarn. On desktop everything is huge, and I assumed it was to cater short-sightedness. Also, you have enabled underlines on buttons on iOS, bold and bigger fonts, etc., so that was also a give away. Sorry if I digress, but, glasses wouldnât help? I have to wear mine all the time, otherwise I am also near blind myself!
@movq@www.uninformativ.de This is awesome! Your server/connection is slow, thought. It took ages to load the GIF! Off topic, what font are you using on that screenshot?
In my quest to find a nicer HTML layout for my site, I just found bloated JavaScript thigs and shitty Google Fonts
hoard of bitfonts: [[https://github.com/robhagemans/hoard-of-bitfonts]] #links #typography #bitmap #fonts #1bit #8bit #pixelart
typography in 8 bits: system fonts: [[https://damieng.com/blog/2011/02/20/typography-in-8-bits-system-fonts]] #links #typography #1bit #8bit #pixelart
after a month hiatus, I am getting back into some low level norns work. 8x8 bitmap fonts look real good on this thing
Maybe itâs just me getting older, but there is something very satisfying about seeing big chunky text on screen. Currently using an Atari font on my computer. Once your eyes get used to it, itâs actually quite lovely.
Litherum: Addition Font https://litherum.blogspot.com/2019/03/addition-font.html
Masters of Science Fiction is actually pretty good if you can get over the extremely post-9/11 vibe, the use of the Star Trek Voyager font everywhere, & the âhostingâ being somebody using the Hawking synth to speak a line after every episode
Mathematical and Puzzle Fonts/Typefaces http://erikdemaine.org/fonts/
Bad idea of the day: set your terminal font to Brand New Roman before starting to code
In one sense, âthe computer revolution is overâ because the period of exponential growth behind the tech ended 10 years ago. In another sense, it hasnât begun: we have sheltered ourselves from the social and intellectual ramifications of computing. Documents are still simulations of paper, & capitalism still exists. So itâs like that period where printing presses existed but everybody used a faux-calligraphic font.
GitHub - robey/font-problems: command-line tool for reading and writing console bitmap fonts https://github.com/robey/font-problems
Fonts for Complex Data | News, Notes & Observations | Hoefler & Co. https://www.typography.com/blog/fonts-for-complex-data
Bad idea of the day: an extension that renders every word in a font chosen based on the hash of that word
Bad idea of the day: mirror all google fonts on ipfs and then use an extension that rewrites the urls to use that version. Alternately: use an extension that downloads them via tor.
Input: Fonts for Code â Info â http://input.fontbureau.com/info/
I â„ Icon Fonts ?~L~X https://notiz.blog/b/1Mz
Iâve made a font⊠kind of⊠?~L~X https://notiz.blog/b/1AZ