Searching txt.sour.is

Twts matching #Twtxt
Sort by: Newest, Oldest, Most Relevant
niplav.site
 (4y ago)

@adi@twtxt.net “@niplav Your reasoning is that if Zeus would create mistresses he would create too many people?” -> Nope, that he wouldn’t be able to control them (since they are only slightly less powerful than him), and “you cannot put down what you have conjured up”

⤋ Read More
anth
a.9srv.net
 (4y ago)

Sure. I think search, if it’s going to exist, should be the client’s responsibility. But I also value the readability of the raw twtxt file a lot more than y’all do.

⤋ Read More
niplav.site
 (4y ago)

@(frogorbits.com) @niplav@niplav.github.io “I sign a lot less stuff these days now that my phone can pretend to be a credit card. Also: an impostor with a quantum computer can’t pretend to sign documents on my behalf…” -> It’s good that pen signatures are completely unfakeable. They’re unbelievably reliable. We can’t just copy & photoshop around the edges. Better worry about those definitely-soon-to-exist quantum computers that might crack cryptography.

⤋ Read More
niplav.site
 (4y ago)

@adi@twtxt.net “I usually seen the opposite. Women are more interested in longevity and happy that studies show that they live more than men.” -> I probably could have been clearer: It seems to me that women are on average much less interested in life-extension (methods beyond usual health advice such as the old “exercise, eat vegetables”) than men. This might just be founder/sampling bias (life extension comes out of the relatively male dominated libertarian/techno-optimist cluster). Actually, maybe there’s just a variance thing here: median man cares less about his longevity than the median woman, but the variance for men is higher.

⤋ Read More
niplav.site
 (4y ago)

@jlj@twt.nfld.uk “A good read: Why I find longtermism hard – […]” -> Interesting! I don’t particularly share that emotional intuition (although my bias probably cuts the other way: I am more moved by interesting projects, and more interesting problems probably also less neglected)–I generally find most problems other people find salient not very moving at all (although probably equally strongly moved by extremely near suffering compared to other people, but with a stronger emotional distance discount). EA makes sense in a very different way to me (phenomenologically, probably closest to philosophical high valence states it evokes).

⤋ Read More
anth
a.9srv.net
 (4y ago)
↳ In-reply-to » My finger server now includes the last post from tw that doesn't have a subject. 'finger a@9srv.net'

Huh. In my feed, there is (correctly) a backslash before that . in the sed command, but twtxt.net is stripping it.

⤋ Read More
niplav.site
 (4y ago)

@jlj@twt.nfld.uk “Anyone running Urbit? Thinking about having a play with a comet. ☄🌒” -> Just as @movq@www.uninformativ.de has problems with his reading queue, I have problems with my “things to explore” queue. I even bought a planet a while back, but haven’t had time to dive into the extradimensional madness of the urbit system. Subjective impressions & reviews highly anticipated!

⤋ Read More
niplav.site
 (4y ago)

@jlj@twt.nfld.uk “@niplav (#4qeibma) Hadn’t heard of this; thanks for the tip! Been getting lost in your text reviews; the Benatar piece piqued my interest: I’d been reading a critique of his earlier work – in Overall’s Why Have Children? – that really wasn’t up to scratch. Now I’m reading about pure replicators, which is a new concept, to me. :-)” -> Nice :-) Looking over my text reviews, they’re not quite finished (especially the Benatar one), so take it with a grain of salt

⤋ Read More
xuu
txt.sour.is
 (4y ago)

@prologic@twtxt.net we would want:

  • a way to reply to the current thread. We have this.
  • a way to reply to a specific twt. Need this. Maybe make all the replies start new conversations?
  • check if twt is start of a conversation.. we kinda have this in the main feed with the conversation button. need to extend it for forked convs
  • a way to inline first replies. maybe show one or two in the sub thread with a link to view.
  • for convenience have a link to parent conv?

⤋ Read More
xuu
txt.sour.is
 (4y ago)

@vain@www.uninformativ.de I have seen it pop up on a few feeds around and adopted it into the new parser I built.

The format I have followed has been '# ' :whitespace: :key-name: :whitespace: '=' :whitespace: :value: keys can be repeated and accessed like an array of values.

⤋ Read More
xuu
txt.sour.is
 (4y ago)

@prologic@twtxt.net That is strange.. i wonder if there is another change that is causing it. Benchmarks are thinking the other way :|

BenchmarkAll/retwt-16                  1        4940172200 ns/op       587319376 B/op    2587159 allocs/op
BenchmarkAll/lextwt-16                 1         775764020 ns/op         9223088 B/op     197557 allocs/op
BenchmarkParse/retwt-16                1         591158277 ns/op        67539096 B/op     230841 allocs/op
BenchmarkParse/lextwt-16               1         716961837 ns/op         5450448 B/op     130290 allocs/op
BenchmarkOutput/retwt-html-16          1        8358103017 ns/op       918709168 B/op    4692292 allocs/op
BenchmarkOutput/lextwt-html-16         1         822033267 ns/op        14280112 B/op     261795 allocs/op
BenchmarkOutput/retwt-markdown-16      1        8114225415 ns/op       929928384 B/op    4693004 allocs/op
BenchmarkOutput/lextwt-markdown-16     1         806554306 ns/op        14332608 B/op     270905 allocs/op
BenchmarkOutput/retwt-text-16          1        8098215897 ns/op       923862192 B/op    4684739 allocs/op
BenchmarkOutput/lextwt-text-16         1         745064673 ns/op        12689784 B/op     252476 allocs/op
BenchmarkOutput/retwt-literal-16       1        4068799822 ns/op       409517880 B/op    2372471 allocs/op
BenchmarkOutput/lextwt-literal-16      1         754793627 ns/op         9834520 B/op     214931 allocs/op

⤋ Read More