abucci

anthony.buc.ci

No description provided.

Recent twts from abucci
In-reply-to » I've only been using snac/the fediverse for a few days and already I've had to mute somebody. I know I come on strongly with my opinions sometimes and some people don't like that, but this person had already started going ad hominem (in my reading of it), and was using what felt to me like sketchy tactics to distract from the point I was trying to make and to shut down conversation. They were doing similar things to other people in the thread so rather than wait for it to get bad for me I just muted them. People get so weirdly defensive so fast when you disagree with something they said online. Not sure I fully understand that.

@prologic@twtxt.net attacking the person, not the idea. Itā€™d be like if you said ā€œyarn is better than mastodon because it isnā€™t push basedā€ and someone who disagreed with you said ā€œwell you think that because youā€™re an idiotā€ or something like that.

ā¤‹ Read More

Iā€™ve only been using snac/the fediverse for a few days and already Iā€™ve had to mute somebody. I know I come on strongly with my opinions sometimes and some people donā€™t like that, but this person had already started going ad hominem (in my reading of it), and was using what felt to me like sketchy tactics to distract from the point I was trying to make and to shut down conversation. They were doing similar things to other people in the thread so rather than wait for it to get bad for me I just muted them. People get so weirdly defensive so fast when you disagree with something they said online. Not sure I fully understand that.

ā¤‹ Read More

I just received this email and I have some questions:

Thisā€‰emailā€‰is fromā€‰aā€‰trustedā€‰sĪæurce.

You received this abucci@bucci.onl because you have been disconnected from sending and receiving emails.

To continue using this email address we urge you to re-confirm if your account is still active on bucci.onl to officially unlock it to our default settings.

Re-confirm account (a link; removed)

ā€» This process is very important to help us protect your internet and fight malicious activities.

Since I administer bucci.onl myself, Iā€™m a little confused. I donā€™t recall disconnecting myself from sending and receiving emails. I donā€™t even know how you disconnect someone from that. I also have never created the email address this email appears to be coming from, but maybe I should trust it anyway since they told me itā€™s a trusted source? Most puzzlingly, Iā€™ve been sending and receiving emails just fine all morning, so I do not appear to be disconnected from anything? I want to help protect the internet and fight malicious activities, but what should I do??? šŸ¤”šŸ¤”šŸ¤”šŸ¤”šŸ¤”

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » I used to be a big fan of a service called cocalc, which you could also self host. It was kind of an integrated math, data science, research, writing, and teaching platform.

@prologic@twtxt.net It was super useful if you needed to do the sorts of things it did. Iā€™m pretty sad.

At its core was Sage, a computational mathematics system, and their own version of Jupyter notebooks. So, you could do all kinds of different math stuff in a notebook environment and share that with people. But on top of that, there was a chat system, a collaborative editing system, a course management system (so if you were teaching a class using it you could keep track of students, assignments, grades, that sort of thing), and a bunch of other stuff I never used. It all ran in a linux container with python/conda as a base, so you could also drop to a terminal, install stuff in the container, and run X11 applications in the same environment. I never taught a class with it but I used to use it semi-regularly to experiment with ideas.

ā¤‹ Read More

I used to be a big fan of a service called cocalc, which you could also self host. It was kind of an integrated math, data science, research, writing, and teaching platform.

I hadnā€™t run it in awhile, and when I checked in with it today I found their web site brags that cocalc is now ā€œextensively integrated with ChatGPTā€.

Which means I canā€™t use it anymore, and frankly anyone doing anything serious shouldnā€™t use it either. Very disappointing.

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » ASCIIFlow This is kind of cool šŸ˜…

@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org oh wow nice, I got it running with no trouble:




     |
     |
     |                             .
     |                             |     |
     |                             |     |
     |                             |     |
     |__________                   |     |
     /          |   _,..----.      |     /     ,Y-o..
    .|          ,-''        |      /    .'    /      ' .
    ||          [   --.....-      |     |     |         `.
    ||          |".........__     |     |     \          |
     b          |            '    |    |       \         |
                |                |     |        `.    _,'
                |                |     '          `'''



                     ,        ,   .       .
           \        .'|   ,-'\V   d---.   |...
           \.      ,'|   /   |/   |       /  |
            ` ...,' ,'   `..,Y   /       /    |
                   _/        |           |    |
                  ,'         |
        -._______/



ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » ASCIIFlow This is kind of cool šŸ˜…

I take it back. Excalidraw is like tldrawā€“you can integrate it into a Javascript front end if you want. Which means technically you could self-host it if you wanted, but youā€™d have to write your own front end code to embed it, and host that code somehow.

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » ASCIIFlow This is kind of cool šŸ˜…

@prologic@twtxt.net I see what you mean about tldraw. I looked at their github repository and it seems like they are distributing it as an npm package for people who want to include a whiteboard in their Javascript-based frontend. I didnā€™t see a way to just launch the thing.

I have half a mind to write a little scala frontend that sets up one of these, since scalajs makes it very easy to use these Javascript web component things while making it look like youā€™re writing scala.

ā¤‹ Read More

Iā€™m playing around with snac2, which I think @stigatle@yarn.stigatle.no mentioned on here, and I have to say itā€™s extremely easy to set up and itā€™s been pretty straightforward so far. I wanted to experiment with having a presence on the Fediverse without going through the process of picking Mastodon vs. Gnu Social vs. Friendica vs. ā€¦, and I wanted to self-host instead of picking an instance of one of those. For now Iā€™m abucci@buc.ci, but no guarantees that will remain stable; Iā€™m just testing for the time being.

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » So in the wave of all things AI and this roller coaster we're all on, apparently actors, writers and so on are all on strike. I don't recall seeing anything in my feeds about this, so I had to ask a few folk in real life wtf was going on there...

@prologic@twtxt.net Couldnā€™t agree more

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » Li-Fi, light-based networking standard released Today, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) has added 802.11bb as a standard for light-based wireless communications. The publishing of the standard has beenĀ welcomedĀ by global Li-Fi businesses, as it will help speed the rollout and adoption of the Ā data-transmission technology standard. Where Li-Fi shines (pun intended) is not just in its purported speedsĀ as fast as 224 GB/s. Fraunhoferā€™s Dominic Schulz points ou ... āŒ˜ Read more

@prologic@twtxt.net

  • 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi: long range, can go through walls, fast but not very fast
  • 5.0 GHz Wi-Fi: much shorter range, cannot go very far through walls, quite fast
  • Li-Fi: long range (?), cannot go through any walls, very very fast

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » really annoys me when i go to report an ip address that sent about 80 requests searching for vulns and exploits and the email bounces.

@prologic@twtxt.net I run fail2ban on very aggressive settings to avoid these headaches. That plus manually banning IP ranges that register bots on my pod (šŸ™„) works pretty well for me.

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » @prologic is goryon not in the google app store?

@prologic@twtxt.net bummer, thatā€™s a shame. I ask because I install the vast majority of my phone apps from f-droid these days, and only use Google Play Store when I have no other option. I know the Play Store will have more reach, but Iā€™m guessing reach isnā€™t the highest priority right now.

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » So given's Googleā„¢'s recent policy changes where they now outright and blatantly just admit they'll crawl, index and feed your (yes your fuckind) writings, thoughts, conversations, etc into their AI models; Should we as a small niche community (still growing) think about perhaps finally building Yarn.social v2 where we have encrypted feeds? šŸ˜…

@prologic@twtxt.net hmm, Iā€™d be up for thinking about that. At least at the protocol and design levelā€“Iā€™m afraid I canā€™t help much with Go programming.

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » Time to add

@prologic@twtxt.net Thatā€™s definitely a concern. I guess itā€™s a way to signal unequivocally that you donā€™t want the page indexed. If they do it anyway, they donā€™t really have an excuse to fall back onā€“they just blatantly violated your web siteā€™s policy.

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » I never paid a lot of attention to Ben Shapiro before, but what he says is so transparently asinine it boggles the senses. You really have to have a Fox-addled mind to believe that the search for the submersible was completely faked and that the powers-that-be knew the entire time that it had imploded. To believe that a vast conspiracy among hundreds, thousands (?) of people from several countries and spanning several days was orchestrated to lie to the public in order to.....uh, achieve what exactly? "Undermine institutional credibility"? What does that even mean?

@shreyan@twtxt.net If thatā€™s your reaction to PragerU, then do I have a podcast for you! https://www.stitcher.com/show/the-audit

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » Google Says It'll Scrape Everything You Post Online for AI

@marado@twtxt.net It canā€™t possibly be defensible, which to me always signals an attempt at a power grab. They never explicitly said ā€œwe will use anything we scrape from the web to train our AIā€ beforeā€“thatā€™s new. There is growing pushback against that practice, with numerous legal cases winding through the legal system right now. Some day those cases will be heard and decided on by judges. So theyā€™re trying to get out ahead of that, in my opinion, and cement their claims to this data before thereā€™s a precedent set.

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » Wondering how long I'll keep twitter-related feeds (like on fraidycat, or here) before giving up on them as permanently dead.

With Youtube testing a ā€œthree strikes and youā€™re outā€ policy against people who use ad blockers, Iā€™m also wondering whether Web 2.0 is effectively walled off and I should just give up on it entirely and look elsewhere for information and entertainment.

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » I never paid a lot of attention to Ben Shapiro before, but what he says is so transparently asinine it boggles the senses. You really have to have a Fox-addled mind to believe that the search for the submersible was completely faked and that the powers-that-be knew the entire time that it had imploded. To believe that a vast conspiracy among hundreds, thousands (?) of people from several countries and spanning several days was orchestrated to lie to the public in order to.....uh, achieve what exactly? "Undermine institutional credibility"? What does that even mean?

@xuu Oh wow I didnā€™t know he was associated with PragerU. Iā€™ve listened to a few episodes of The Audit podcast, where they basically shred PragerU content, and itā€™s hilarious and terrifying.

ā¤‹ Read More

I never paid a lot of attention to Ben Shapiro before, but what he says is so transparently asinine it boggles the senses. You really have to have a Fox-addled mind to believe that the search for the submersible was completely faked and that the powers-that-be knew the entire time that it had imploded. To believe that a vast conspiracy among hundreds, thousands (?) of people from several countries and spanning several days was orchestrated to lie to the public in order toā€¦..uh, achieve what exactly? ā€œUndermine institutional credibilityā€? What does that even mean?

This is ā€œthe moon landing was fakedā€ levels of conspiracy theory.

Image

ā¤‹ Read More

These billionaires are profoundly without intelligence or depth. Itā€™s astonishing to see so many shallow, empty fools parading their bad opinions publicly without shame. Let no one ever again fall under the illusion that tech oligarchs are anything more than your racist uncle at Thanksgiving but with more money.

Image

ā¤‹ Read More

Speaking of men getting owned, Ruth Ben-Ghiat, an expert on authoritarianism who wrote the book Strongmen, regularly calls out and degrades wannabe dictators like Elon Musk and itā€™s cathartic to witness.

Image

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » Jordan Peterson likes to mansplain at women when he knows nothing about the subject. Probably because he thinks women should be property of men instead of free individuals.

Also, what a douchebag using the title ā€œDr.ā€ in his twitter handle. As a general rule, a white dude who isnā€™t a medical doctor putting ā€œDr.ā€ in their social media title is a gigantic flashing red flag.

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » Jordan Peterson likes to mansplain at women when he knows nothing about the subject. Probably because he thinks women should be property of men instead of free individuals.

Personally? Iā€™d rather a woman owned Jordan Peterson and got him to shut the fuck up.

ā¤‹ Read More
In-reply-to » Jordan Peterson likes to mansplain at women when he knows nothing about the subject. Probably because he thinks women should be property of men instead of free individuals.

for context, Peterson and a bunch of other know-nothing men are reacting on twitter to an article in The Atlantic co-authored by Applebaum, who has quite a bit of expertise on the subject sheā€™s writing about. That doesnā€™t seem to matter at all to Peterson, who knows nothing of these subjects but opines about them anyway. Sheā€™s been tweeting about these reactions and the screencapture I posted previously is one of hers about Peterson.

ā¤‹ Read More