abucci

anthony.buc.ci

No description provided.

Recent twts from abucci

Found another example of Google stealing something Iā€™ve written and putting it in a ā€œfeatured snippetā€.

Whatā€™s super annoying about this one is that the source is a course page at Tufts University, not the official page of the publication theyā€™re taking this text from. I know the professor who taught that course and Iā€™ve guest lectured for them before on this topic. They put this publication in their course readings, and I guess thatā€™s where Google picked it up.

Image

ā¤‹ Read More

I never paid a lot of attention to Ben Shapiro before, but what he says is so transparently asinine it boggles the senses. You really have to have a Fox-addled mind to believe that the search for the submersible was completely faked and that the powers-that-be knew the entire time that it had imploded. To believe that a vast conspiracy among hundreds, thousands (?) of people from several countries and spanning several days was orchestrated to lie to the public in order toā€¦..uh, achieve what exactly? ā€œUndermine institutional credibilityā€? What does that even mean?

This is ā€œthe moon landing was fakedā€ levels of conspiracy theory.

Image

ā¤‹ Read More

These billionaires are profoundly without intelligence or depth. Itā€™s astonishing to see so many shallow, empty fools parading their bad opinions publicly without shame. Let no one ever again fall under the illusion that tech oligarchs are anything more than your racist uncle at Thanksgiving but with more money.

Image

ā¤‹ Read More

Speaking of men getting owned, Ruth Ben-Ghiat, an expert on authoritarianism who wrote the book Strongmen, regularly calls out and degrades wannabe dictators like Elon Musk and itā€™s cathartic to witness.

Image

ā¤‹ Read More

Image

Letā€™s be clear here. Daniel Penny allegedly choked a black man, Jordan Neely, to death on a subway car. Neely was being loud, but he was not physically threatening anybody and did not have a weapon. In any other context, this would be called ā€œmurderā€, at the very least, ā€œmanslaughterā€ if one were being gracious. Because of the USā€™s history, a white man murdering a black man in sight of the public is oftentimes, and rightfully, called a ā€œlynchingā€. It has a public, political purpose amounting to terrorism.

Daniel Penny was allowed to go free for awhile after this event. He is only now facing accountability, having been recently indicted (arrested and charged with a crime) as he should have been day of. And here is racist right-wing toadie Ben Shapiro saying that Daniel Pennyā€“the white alleged killerā€“is the one being lynched. Not the black man who was allegedly murdered by Penny in view of the public, and who is now dead. Penny himself, who is still very much alive.

@prologic@twtxt.net, I donā€™t know how you go on defending Ben Shapiro, but in the context of US society, what Shapiro is saying is reprehensible and unacceptable. Heā€™s a right-wing troll with disgusting, not to mention flat out stupid, opinions.

ā¤‹ Read More

Image

This guy is just such an idiot lol.

  • Thereā€™s no such mass migration to ā€œthe southā€. Tons of people are leaving Mississippi, Louisiana, Virginia, and New Mexico for instance. I donā€™t know enough about the states with net influxes like Texas and Florida but I suspect they have policies that make it attractive for people to move there
  • Not everybody is able to take account of long-term trends when they make housing decisions. There are financial reasons, family reasons, educational reasons, etc that impact such decisions
  • But of course, most laughably, cheap energy is fast becoming a thing of the past, and so the problem isnā€™t ā€œsolvedā€ by cheap energy, itā€™s just kicked down the road. And ffs, cheap energy is literally causing the very heating that he pretends air conditioning will ā€œsolveā€ā€“like ā€œsolvingā€ your drinking problem by staying drunk all the time

This oversimplification to drive some kind of political point is so embarrassing coming from someone who pretends to be a university professor. It sounds like a teenage doofus from a 1980s movie talking. He well knows all these things, but he decides to present these views anyway.

ā¤‹ Read More

@prologic@twtxt.net @movq@www.uninformativ.de this is the default behavior of pass on my machine:

Image

I add a new password entry named example and then type pass example. The password I chose, ā€œtestā€, is displayed in cleartext. This is very bad default behavior. I donā€™t know about the other clis you both mentioned but Iā€™ll check them out.

The browser plugin browserpass does the same kind of thing, though I have already removed it and Iā€™m not going to reinstall it to make a movie. Next to each credential thereā€™s an icon to copy the username to the clipboard, an icon to copy the password to the clipboard, and then an icon to view details, which shows you everything, including the password, in cleartext. The screencap in the Chrome store is out of date; it doesnā€™t show the offending link to show all details, which I know is there because I literally installed it today and played with it.

ā¤‹ Read More

I was inclined to let this go so as not to stir anything up, but after some additional thought Iā€™ve decided to call it out. This twt:

Image

is exactly the kind of ad hominem garbage I came to expect from Twitterā„¢, and Iā€™m disappointed to see it replicated here. Rummaging through someoneā€™s background trying to find a ā€œgotchaā€ argument to take credibility away from what a person is saying, instead of engaging the ideas directly, is what trolls and bad faith actors do. Thatā€™s what the twt above does (falsely, I might addā€“whatā€™s being claimed is untrue).

If you take issue with something Iā€™ve said, you can mute me, unfollow me, ignore me, use TamperMonkey to turn all my twts into gibberish, engage the ideas directly, etc etc etc. There are plenty of options to make what I said go away. Reading through my links, reading about my organizationā€™s CEOā€™s background, and trying to use that against me somehow (after misinterpreting it no less)? Besides being unacceptable in a rational discussion, and besides being completely ineffective in stopping me from expressing whatever it is you didnā€™t like, itā€™s creepy. Donā€™t do that.

ā¤‹ Read More