Searching txt.sour.is

Twts matching #Twtxt
Sort by: Newest, Oldest, Most Relevant

@vain@www.uninformativ.de I have seen it pop up on a few feeds around and adopted it into the new parser I built.

The format I have followed has been '# ' :whitespace: :key-name: :whitespace: '=' :whitespace: :value: keys can be repeated and accessed like an array of values.

⤋ Read More

@vain@www.uninformativ.de I have seen it pop up on a few feeds around and adopted it into the new parser I built.

The format I have followed has been '# ' :whitespace: :key-name: :whitespace: '=' :whitespace: :value: keys can be repeated and accessed like an array of values.

⤋ Read More

💁‍♂️ If you’re ever on a UNIX machine of some kind without any useful networking utilities like ip or ifconfig, fear now! You can view the network topology of the Kernel by just doing:

cat /proc/net/fib_trie

😲 #Linux #Tips

⤋ Read More
In-reply-to » I wonder if email would be a reasonable way to enable interaction on twtxt... something like publishing an email address for replies in the preamble of your feed, then like twtxt the rest is up to you, but I could imagine a simple moderation queue that could be checked periodically allowing the admin to move approved comments into some public space... I keep thinking I'll add activitypub comments to my site but it seems more complex than I care for. Ironically because of available tooling email actually feels simpler for this... of course, there is spam...

@thewismit@twtxt.psynergy.io @darch@twtxt.net @adi@twtxt.net @prologic@twtxt.net There is another: @hecanjog@hecanjog.com

⤋ Read More
In-reply-to » I wonder if email would be a reasonable way to enable interaction on twtxt... something like publishing an email address for replies in the preamble of your feed, then like twtxt the rest is up to you, but I could imagine a simple moderation queue that could be checked periodically allowing the admin to move approved comments into some public space... I keep thinking I'll add activitypub comments to my site but it seems more complex than I care for. Ironically because of available tooling email actually feels simpler for this... of course, there is spam...

@thewismit@twtxt.psynergy.io @darch@twtxt.net @adi@twtxt.net @prologic@twtxt.net There is another: @hecanjog@hecanjog.com

⤋ Read More

I wonder if email would be a reasonable way to enable interaction on twtxt… something like publishing an email address for replies in the preamble of your feed, then like twtxt the rest is up to you, but I could imagine a simple moderation queue that could be checked periodically allowing the admin to move approved comments into some public space… I keep thinking I’ll add activitypub comments to my site but it seems more complex than I care for. Ironically because of available tooling email actually feels simpler for this… of course, there is spam…

⤋ Read More
In-reply-to » @xuu Re CPU usage of the lextwt branch. There's a noticeable ~2x increase in CPU usage across the board since I deployed this at ~16.30pm (AEST).

@prologic@twtxt.net That is strange.. i wonder if there is another change that is causing it. Benchmarks are thinking the other way :|

BenchmarkAll/retwt-16                  1        4940172200 ns/op       587319376 B/op    2587159 allocs/op
BenchmarkAll/lextwt-16                 1         775764020 ns/op         9223088 B/op     197557 allocs/op
BenchmarkParse/retwt-16                1         591158277 ns/op        67539096 B/op     230841 allocs/op
BenchmarkParse/lextwt-16               1         716961837 ns/op         5450448 B/op     130290 allocs/op
BenchmarkOutput/retwt-html-16          1        8358103017 ns/op       918709168 B/op    4692292 allocs/op
BenchmarkOutput/lextwt-html-16         1         822033267 ns/op        14280112 B/op     261795 allocs/op
BenchmarkOutput/retwt-markdown-16      1        8114225415 ns/op       929928384 B/op    4693004 allocs/op
BenchmarkOutput/lextwt-markdown-16     1         806554306 ns/op        14332608 B/op     270905 allocs/op
BenchmarkOutput/retwt-text-16          1        8098215897 ns/op       923862192 B/op    4684739 allocs/op
BenchmarkOutput/lextwt-text-16         1         745064673 ns/op        12689784 B/op     252476 allocs/op
BenchmarkOutput/retwt-literal-16       1        4068799822 ns/op       409517880 B/op    2372471 allocs/op
BenchmarkOutput/lextwt-literal-16      1         754793627 ns/op         9834520 B/op     214931 allocs/op

⤋ Read More
In-reply-to » @xuu Re CPU usage of the lextwt branch. There's a noticeable ~2x increase in CPU usage across the board since I deployed this at ~16.30pm (AEST).

@prologic@twtxt.net That is strange.. i wonder if there is another change that is causing it. Benchmarks are thinking the other way :|

BenchmarkAll/retwt-16                  1        4940172200 ns/op       587319376 B/op    2587159 allocs/op
BenchmarkAll/lextwt-16                 1         775764020 ns/op         9223088 B/op     197557 allocs/op
BenchmarkParse/retwt-16                1         591158277 ns/op        67539096 B/op     230841 allocs/op
BenchmarkParse/lextwt-16               1         716961837 ns/op         5450448 B/op     130290 allocs/op
BenchmarkOutput/retwt-html-16          1        8358103017 ns/op       918709168 B/op    4692292 allocs/op
BenchmarkOutput/lextwt-html-16         1         822033267 ns/op        14280112 B/op     261795 allocs/op
BenchmarkOutput/retwt-markdown-16      1        8114225415 ns/op       929928384 B/op    4693004 allocs/op
BenchmarkOutput/lextwt-markdown-16     1         806554306 ns/op        14332608 B/op     270905 allocs/op
BenchmarkOutput/retwt-text-16          1        8098215897 ns/op       923862192 B/op    4684739 allocs/op
BenchmarkOutput/lextwt-text-16         1         745064673 ns/op        12689784 B/op     252476 allocs/op
BenchmarkOutput/retwt-literal-16       1        4068799822 ns/op       409517880 B/op    2372471 allocs/op
BenchmarkOutput/lextwt-literal-16      1         754793627 ns/op         9834520 B/op     214931 allocs/op

⤋ Read More
In-reply-to » @xuu Btw... I noticed your pod has some changed I'm not familiar with, for example you seem to have added metadata to the top of feeds. Can you enumerate the improvements/changes you've made and possibly let's discuss contributing them back upstream? :D

@prologic@twtxt.net the meta info on the top I added manually. it’s following what I have seen from some other twtxt feeds. the new parser will read them.

⤋ Read More
In-reply-to » @xuu Btw... I noticed your pod has some changed I'm not familiar with, for example you seem to have added metadata to the top of feeds. Can you enumerate the improvements/changes you've made and possibly let's discuss contributing them back upstream? :D

@prologic@twtxt.net the meta info on the top I added manually. it’s following what I have seen from some other twtxt feeds. the new parser will read them.

⤋ Read More