lobste_rs 

feeds.twtxt.net

No description provided.

What next after vibe coding
One interesting possible future of the emergence of β€œvibe coding” as common terminology is the possibility to position an alternative.

β€œReal coding”?

Future think pieces:

  • β€˜You can get yourself up and running quickly with β€œvibe coding” but when you get traction you’re going to want have people doing β€œreal coding”’

  • β€˜switching from vibe coding to real coding will typically cost you X% of you initial development, so don’t put off switching too late’

[Comments](https://lobste.rs/s/m … ⌘ Read more

​ Read More

How can one write blazing fast yet useful compilers (for lazy pure functional languages)?
I’ve decided enough is enough and I want to write my own compiler (seems I caught a bug and lobste.rs is definitely not discouraging it). The language I have in mind is a basic (lazy?) statically-typed pure functional programming language with do notation and records (i.e. mostly Haskell-lite).

I have other ideas I’d like to explore as well, but mainly, I want the compiler to be so fast (w/ optimisations) that … ⌘ Read more

​ Read More