@thecanine@twtxt.net wow this is horrifying. What happened to Opera? It used to be my favorite browser but now theyâre like that one cousin who started getting into drugs, and then got in trouble with the law, and then before you know it theyâre scamming old ladies out of their pension money.
@darch@neotxt.dk Made up is not the same as lie. Thatâs obvious isnât it?!?!
@darch@neotxt.dk So a fiction novel, which is labelled âfictionâ, is a lie? I still donât understand. The word âlieâ entails an intention to deceive, but fiction writing does not intend to deceive.
@carsten@yarn.zn80.net You are conflating âaiming your eyes atâ with âviewing artâ. These are fundamentally different activities.
@carsten@yarn.zn80.net Animals have inner lives. Computers do not.
Are you really so desperate to make this point thst youâre citing Quora??? Believe what you want to believe.
@darch@neotxt.dk What do you mean when you say that art is a lie?
@prologic@twtxt.net @carsten@yarn.zn80.net
There is (I assure you there will be, donât know what it is yetâŚ) a price to be paid for this convenience.
Exactly prologic, and thatâs why Iâm negative about these sorts of things. Iâm almost 50, Iâve been around this tech hype cycle a bunch of times. Look at what happened with Facebook. When it first appeared, people loved it and signed up and shared incredibly detailed information about themselves on it. Facebook made it very easy and convenient for almost anyone, even people who had limited understanding of the internet or computers, to get connected with their friends and family. And now here we are today, where 80% of people in surveys say they donât trust Facebook with their private data, where they think Facebook commits crimes and should be broken up or at least taken to task in a big way, etc etc etc. Facebook has been fined many billions of dollars and faces endless federal lawsuits in the US alone for its horrible practices. Yet Facebook is still exploitative. Itâs a societal cancer.
All signs suggest this generative AI stuff is going to go exactly the same way. That is the inevitable course of these things in the present climate, because the tech sector is largely run by sociopathic billionaires, because the tech sector is not regulated in any meaningful way, and because the tech press / tech media has no scruples. Some new tech thing generates hype, people get excited and sign up to use it, then when the people who own the tech think they have a critical mass of users, they clamp everything down and start doing whatever it is they wanted to do from the start. Theyâll break laws, steal your shit, cause mass suffering, who knows what. They wonât stop until they are stopped by mass protest from us, and the government action that follows.
Thatâs a huge price to pay for a little bit of convenience, a price we pay and continue to pay for decades. We all know better by now. Why do we keep doing this to ourselves? It doesnât make sense. Itâs insane.
I have to write so many emails to so many idiots who have no idea what they are doing
So it sounds to me like the pressure is to reduce how much time you waste on idiots, which to my mind is a very good reason to use a text generator! I guess in that case you donât mind too much whether the company making the AI owns your prompt text?
Iâd really like to see tools like this that you can run on your desktop or phone, so they donât send your hard work off to someone else and give a company a chance to take it from you.
@prologic@twtxt.net @carsten@yarn.zn80.net
(1) You go to the store and buy a microwave pizza. You go home, put it in the microwave, heat it up. Maybe itâs not quite the way you like it, so you put some red pepper on it, maybe some oregano.
Are you a pizza chef? No. Do we know what your cooking is like? Also no.
(2) You create a prompt for StableDiffusion to make a picture of an elephant. What pops out isnât quite to your liking. You adjust the prompt, tweak it a bunch, till the elephant looks pretty cool.
Are you an artist? No. Do we know what your art is like? Also no.
The elephant is âfake artâ in a similar sense to how a microwave pizza is âfake pizzaâ. Thatâs what I meant by that word. The microwave pizza is a sort of âsimulation of pizzaâ, in this sense. The generated elephant picture is a simulation of art, in a similar sense, though itâs even worse than that and is probably more of a simulacrum of art since you canât âconsumeâ an AI-generated image the way you âconsumeâ art.
@carsten@yarn.zn80.net @lyse@lyse.isobeef.org I also think it is best called fake. Art is created by human beings, for human beings. It mediates a relationship between two people, and is a means of expression.
A computer has no inner life, no feelings, no experience of the world. It is not sentient. It has no life. Thereâs nothing âinâ there for it to express. Itâs just generating pixels in patterns weâve learned to recognize. These AI technologies are carefully crafted to fool people into experiencing the things they experience when they look at human-made art, but it is an empty experience.
@carsten@yarn.zn80.net Who says you need to use anything like that? Whereâs the pressure coming from?
@carsten@yarn.zn80.net yeesh, itâs a for-pay company I wouldnât give them the output of your mind for free and train their AI for them.
@xuu@txt.sour.is this is alarmingly catchy
@xuu@txt.sour.is everyoneâs moving to gated communities!
@prologic@twtxt.net ack, I didnât see this before. Get well soon!
ChatGPT and Elasticsearch: OpenAI meets private data | Elastic Blog
Terrifying. Elasticsearch is celebrating that theyâre going to send your private data to OpenAI? No way.
@prologic@twtxt.net Iâm a bit of a GPU junkie (đł) and I have 3, 2019-era GPUs lying around. One of these days when I have Free Time⢠Iâll put those together into some kind of clusterâŚ.
yarnd
, tt
, jenny
, twtr
and other clients? đ¤ Thinking about (and talking with @xuu on IRC) about the possibility of rewriting a completely new spec (no extensions). Proposed name yarn.txt
or "Yarn". Compatibility would remain with Twtxt in the sense that we wouldn't break anything per se, but we'd divorce ourselves from Twtxt and be free to improve based on the needs of the community and not the ideals of those that don't use, contribute in the first place or fixate on nostalgia (which doesn't really help anyone).
@darch@neotxt.dk yes!
@prologic@twtxt.net yeah. Iâd add âBig Dataâ to that hype list, and Iâm sure there are a bunch more that Iâm forgetting.
On the topic of a GPU cluster, the optimal design is going to depend a lot on what workloads you intend to run on it. The weakest link in these things is the data transfer rate, but that wonât matter too much for compute-heavy workloads. If your workloads are going to involve a lot of data, though, youâd be better off with a smaller number of high-VRAM cards than with a larger number of interconnected cards. I guess thatâs hardware engineering 101 stuff, but stillâŚ
yarnd
, tt
, jenny
, twtr
and other clients? đ¤ Thinking about (and talking with @xuu on IRC) about the possibility of rewriting a completely new spec (no extensions). Proposed name yarn.txt
or "Yarn". Compatibility would remain with Twtxt in the sense that we wouldn't break anything per se, but we'd divorce ourselves from Twtxt and be free to improve based on the needs of the community and not the ideals of those that don't use, contribute in the first place or fixate on nostalgia (which doesn't really help anyone).
@prologic@twtxt.net I would politely suggest again that we not react to people with bad attitudes who talk shit about yarn. If twt is forked, it should be forked to add features that are otherwise not possible. Not to appease people who will probably never be appeased.
On LinkedIn I see a lot of posts aimed at software developers along the lines of âIf youâre not using these AI tools (X,Y,Z) youâre going to be left behind.â
Two things about that:
- No youâre not. If you have good soft skills (good communication, show up on time, general time management) then youâre already in excellent shape. No AI can do that stuff, and for that alone no AI can replace people
- This rhetoric is coming directly from the billionaires who are laying off tech people by the 100s of thousands as part of the class war theyâve been conducting against all working people since the 1940s. They want you to believe that you have to scramble and claw over one another to learn the âAIâ that theyâre forcing onto the world, so that you stop honing the skills that matter (see #1) and are easier to obsolete later. Donât fall for it. Itâs far from clear how this will shake out once governments get off their asses and start regulating this stuff, by the wayâmost of these âAIâ tools are blatantly breaking copyright and other IP laws, and some day thatâll catch up with them.
That said, it is helpful to know thy enemy.
@movq@www.uninformativ.de Cheers! Iâm happy to agree to disagree too of course! Thanks for engaging!
@xuu@txt.sour.is That has no relevance to the point!
Plugin proposal for yarn: If a userâs first post contains the string âNFTâ, they are auto-banned.
⨠Follow
button on their profile page or use the Follow form and enter a Twtxt URL. You may also find other feeds of interest via Feeds. Welcome! đ¤
hello @bender@anthony.buc.ci clone of @bender@twtxt.net
âDonât cling to a mistake just because youâve spent a lot of time making it.â
@xuu yeah, I know less about ISO27k (in part because you have to pay for access to the complete standards documents!!!), but I figured it was similar.
@xuu@txt.sour.is proof of stake = people with money get more money. It accelerates the wealth inequality problems that are already plaguing us. Crypto has even worse wealth inequality than fiat currency systems, which is 100% predictable.