@bender@twtxt.net This is true! (as we spoke!) It’s okay though, I think we’ll eventually solve this as it becomes a thing that annoys us too much 🤣 I like your idea of having some optional, but recommended of handling edits. Like having something like (#d4acmcq was:zllu75a) just for an example. Extending the Subject Extension to support (#hash [was:<hash>])? 🤔

⤋ Read More

Participate

Login to join in on this yarn.