“640K ought to be enough for anybody.” — Clearly not for yarnd, if you want to keep a big cache time to live, and a huge amount of cache items. 😂

@fastidious@arrakis.netbros.com Hahaha 😂 It’s of course a trade-off 😅 For users like you we _may_have to consider building another Cache implementation 😂

But of course you will trade performance for size, or ability to have larger caches.

@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org Indeed I’m so glad to have gotten to the bottom of it 🤣