This interesting video about AI art, just came out: https://youtu.be/nIRbN52PA0o

I already knew, most of what it was talking about, but found it interesting, that no company, developing music generating AI, was ever brave enough to use copyrighted music, for training. They all seen to have no problem, doing it with images.

It’s not surprising, I’ve already expected it to be the case. It just amazes me, how they find a way to incorporate the “music is worth money, images are not” bias into everything.

It’s more so a battle of lawyers, than artists at this point - or perhaps it always has been. With the corporations, using the garbage flat art and “nothing music*” for their interests and letting stupid and underpaid artists, eat the (usually deserved) backlash for it.

*nothing music/corporate music is a whole other chapter itself, if anyone wants to find out more about that, this is a good start: https://youtu.be/AIxY_Y9TGWI

⤋ Read More

@thecanine@twtxt.net For me it’s a bit like software really. Back in the ‘old days, people used to value software, they’d pay money for good software. Nowadays, people don’t. THey are happy to either pay a subscription fee or pay $0 for a service that erodes their privacy/security and shoves ads in their face with data collected on them and sold to the company’s actual customers (not you).

⤋ Read More

Participate

Login to join in on this yarn.