Yarn

Recent twts in reply to #pgrkgwq

  • l would loose the twt and just call it a post and Root post
  • Call a conversation for a conversationor thread instead of inventing new words like yarn - I like the name Yarn for the software, but i would use normal words in the UI etc.
  • This is a Post box, so Post box should be called Input box, Post form or maybe Compose form

⤋ Read More

yes I agree we should define Yarn, but what we are building is not that special to the end users, who I images will just be confused about what twt, yarn, thooth etc. are. compare to using familiar words like post and tread. Tread also binds nicly with the yarn as a overall concept :)
For the technical layer, then yes, we should have a vocabulary that can be closer to the “metal”, but not in the UI

⤋ Read More

@darch@twtxt.net Yes but what about “Tweet” and “Twitter”. “Google”. ALl these things have become common language over time time. None of these were every in any “standard dictionary” or “language” until they were created. So I don’t really quite agree with you here. We should use Yarn and Twt as terms because there are aspects of what we’ve created that are strong differentiators.

⤋ Read More

For example:

  • Yarns are short-lived and deliberately fall off the “Active Cache” on purpose.
  • Yarn.social (the platform and pods) are difficult to abuse.
  • The ecosystem is decentralised twtxt and yarnd is distributed.

And so forth… There are a few other properties, but I won’t list them all here…

⤋ Read More

@prologic@twtxt.net we also say to google stuff in Danish, so it’s not a all uncommon outside the anglosphere. I just want to keep things simple and familiar to new users and not having a barrier of slang to overcome.

So is the idea with the Glossary to be technical documentation or what features are called in the end-user exposed UI?

⤋ Read More

@darch@twtxt.net I understand 🤗

So is the idea with the Glossary to be technical documentation or what features are called in the end-user exposed UI?

No I literally hacked it up this evening because @ullarah@txt.quisquiliae.com suggested (rightfully so) that we should have some kind if definition of terms we used. Which I agreed with 👌 Nothing in the WIki is really public facing in the sense of the word – more geared towards Developers, Contributors and Poderators (another term we seem to be using lately) really. Keep on Yarn’n 😅

⤋ Read More

Participate

Login to join in on this yarn.