https://social.woodbine.nyc/@cel/109860034904856462 for possible #ActivityPub #yarn.social #twtxt integration @prologic@twtxt.net #DecentSocial #fediverse
@cel@celehner.com any takers to help me with this work? 🤔
@prologic@twtxt.net What’s your current plan/concept on this?
@ocdtrekkie@twtxt.net Not sure yet 🤗
But…. I’m a bit more convinced that it might be possible to create a Twtxt <-> ActivityPub bridge as a separate optional (opt-in) service for Yarn.social users – Hell I think it might be possible in general for any self-hosted Twtxt users that self-host their own feed (without yarnd).
@prologic@twtxt.net Awesome. We need to catch up. Hoping to make it tomorrow maybe.
@prologic@twtxt.net that would be very nice, and remove the need to have more services running. I think it would attract more people to run this to use that, sunce yarnd is very easy to set up and run.
@stigatle@twtxt.net Do you think it should directly be integrated into yarnd or a separate service / binary / project? 🤔 Opt-in or Opt-out?
@prologic@twtxt.net personally I would like it integrated and opt-in. just enable with a flag when starting up yarnd.
@prologic@twtxt.net a separate binay would work too, maybe yarnd could just start it. if its a separate project - then it could possibly be useful for others as well? Im not sure, Im just thinking - the easier it is to set up and run - the better it is for everyone. Im sure it can be easy to set up and use either way.
@stigatle@yarn.stigatle.no The reason I was thinking about a separate binary / project / service is to bring along our Twtxt friends like @movq@www.uninformativ.de and @lyse@lyse.isobeef.org and anyone else that self-hosted their Twtxt feed on their own. But this of course has added complexities like spinning up yanrd along with whatever this thing will be called configuring the two and connecting them. Fortunately however yarnd already does this with the feeds service and defaults to using feeds.twtxt.net – So we would so something similar there too. Further thoughts? 🤔