For implementations, it would be nice if “update twts” always came after the twt they are referring to. So I thought about using this opportunity to mandate append-style feeds. But that’s just me being lazy. Implementations will have to be able to cope with any order, because feeds cannot/should not be trusted. 🫤

@movq@www.uninformativ.de I think the order of the lines in a feed don’t matter as long as we can guarantee the order of Twts. Clients should already be ordering by Timestamp anyway.

@prologic@twtxt.net Yeah, you’re right. That’s an implementation detail of jenny. Right now, the order of twts doesn’t matter at all, because it’s only relevant at display time – and that’s the job of mutt. 😅