Firstly, contributing software to an open source project cannot be a blanket “get out of jail free” card. That’s a sociopathic stance, on its face, and just cannot be accepted.
I don’t understand. Why is that sociopathic? (Language barrier here? I really don’t get what you mean.)
But thirdly, […] And the same should happen in software. […]
How do you really know if a project has been used in dangerous situations? (If this changes in the future, are programmers that contributed in the past – when this project was not yet used in dangerous situations – also liable?)