@tkanos@twtxt.net This is essentially allowing for Nazi pods, because that is one of the first cohorts that will come here once it’s adopted by enough people. That’s what has been happening with Mastodon. I think we can do better.

@prologic@twtxt.net this sounds to me like the current moderation scheme for Mastodon. I guess it’s good enough for now.

Indeed I’d like to know the philosophical difference between Mastodon and Yarn, since I think these are main competitors in a similar but not exactly equal space.

With those ideas and values, defining a ‘fair’ moderation scheme is easier IMO.

@prologic@twtxt.net Right, I forgot of that page

I’ll remark the following:

Keep it as simple as possible
Do not compromise on data security and user privacy
Software should be lightweight
Self hosted software is preferable over cloud services or SaaS
Ship early, Ship often

I’d stay with Keep it as simple as possible, but not more than that. And Lightweight.

I have worked on apps rejected by App Store due to lack of moderating features. I’m aware it’s tricky. I think the decentralized part could be managed like with Feed readers.

@prologic@twtxt.net Yeah, sorry, I was throwing random ideas on your previous conversation.

I’ll follow on what you all decide, to be in the loop, and we could talk later on how it would impact future versions of the mobile app.