@jmjl@tilde.green Hmmmmmmm, I’m not sure. 🤔 Other than what @prologic@twtxt.net said, I think this could be one of those features that open the gates for spam. You don’t really have control anymore over which people you follow, so anyone could come along, push twts to that registry and thus spam your timeline. (Hence jenny would also need a mute feature.)

twtxt is very pull-based at the moment. In my eyes, this is a core feature. Making it push-based changes the game a lot. 🤔

I get the appeal, though. Discovering new people doesn’t work that well inside of twtxt. You need external tools for that.

@movq@www.uninformativ.de Yeah I concur 👌

twtxt is very pull-based at the moment. In my eyes, this is a core feature. Making it push-based changes the game a lot. 🤔

This is the primary reason I’m pulling activity pub support out of yarnd. I may (and it was planned) still build a completely separate service the abstract away the “push” nature of ActivityPub forcing our usage/interaction of it to be “pull” based. We’ll see 🤔

@prologic@twtxt.net you’re planning to stop AP support before doing the bridge?

and if so, can we implement migration first?

@marado@twtxt.net Maybe we can leave the code for now until we build the bridge? 🤔