In-reply-to » @prologic, does this rings a bell to you? 159-196-9-199.9fc409.mel.nbn.aussiebb.net

@bender@twtxt.net 404 could be indeed a temporary error if the file resides on a mounted remote filesystem and then the mount point fails for some reason. With a symlink from the web root to the file on the mount, the web server probably will not recognize the mount point failure as such. Thus, it might not reply with a 503 Service Unavailable (or something like that), but 404 Not Found instead. (I could be wrong on that, though.)

The rightℱ way is to signal 410 Gone if the feed does not exist anymore and will not come back to life again. But that’s hard to come by in the wild. Somebody has to manually configure that in almost all situations.

But yes, as @falsifian@www.falsifian.org points out, exponential backoff looks like a good strategy. Probably even report a failure to users somehow, so they can check and potentially unsubscribe.

​ Read More
In-reply-to » @xuu I don’t even have a WhatsApp password, it never asked me? đŸ€”

@xuu poor lady! đŸ˜© I have trained mum to call me with anything remotely fishy. She pretty much don’t trust anything. On top of the weekends, when I visit them, I usually go to their house once or twice during working days, to check on emails, calls, or funny looking snail mail.

​ Read More
In-reply-to » @xuu I don’t even have a WhatsApp password, it never asked me? đŸ€”

Its supposed to be tied to your phone number.. but they managed to get it activated on a different device some how. /shrug

​ Read More
In-reply-to » My mate just said "WTF, there's somehow a wall lizard in the family tree" and I can only agree: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezgweVd4a98 Looks like this is the first real evidence of those lizard people. :-D

@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org saw it, thanks! It pains me to see that speed. I mean, I blink slower than what it took that guy to climb that wall. LOL.

​ Read More
In-reply-to » @prologic, does this rings a bell to you? 159-196-9-199.9fc409.mel.nbn.aussiebb.net

@prologic@twtxt.net no worries mate, and thanks! I wonder if something could be done for feeds rendering 404, so that they get automatically “unfollowed”, and removed.

A twtxt.txt file should never spit out a 404, unless it’s no more.

​ Read More
In-reply-to » My mate just said "WTF, there's somehow a wall lizard in the family tree" and I can only agree: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ezgweVd4a98 Looks like this is the first real evidence of those lizard people. :-D

@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org this what I get:

“Video unavailable
The uploader has not made this video available in your country”

​ Read More
In-reply-to » Speaking of web server logs: Unless someone posts one of my blog posts on HackerNews (I never do that myself, don’t even have an account), my twtxt.txt file is always the most requested resource. 😂 It easily gets several thousand hits, way more than the blog’s Atom feed. 😂

Gotta keep up to date đŸ€Ł

​ Read More
In-reply-to » Speaking of web server logs: Unless someone posts one of my blog posts on HackerNews (I never do that myself, don’t even have an account), my twtxt.txt file is always the most requested resource. 😂 It easily gets several thousand hits, way more than the blog’s Atom feed. 😂

@lyse@lyse.isobeef.org Yeah, indeed, but still. 😂

​ Read More
In-reply-to » Speaking of web server logs: Unless someone posts one of my blog posts on HackerNews (I never do that myself, don’t even have an account), my twtxt.txt file is always the most requested resource. 😂 It easily gets several thousand hits, way more than the blog’s Atom feed. 😂

@movq@www.uninformativ.de No wonder with all these yarnds. :-D

​ Read More
In-reply-to » @prologic I didn’t want to hijack @bender’s thread: There’s two things that feel a bit unexpected regarding the requests of 159.196.9.199 in my logs:

@movq@www.uninformativ.de Maybe they’re not all coming from yarnd, but one of them could be from yarns, the search engine. Just a wild guess. My twtxt.txt access log doesn’t record the source IP address, so I don’t know.

And aren’t there any other hosted yarnd instances? Maybe it was never really implemented, but I remember @prologic@twtxt.net thought about hosting dedicated yarnds for others in the past. Could be well over a year ago, not sure.

Another possibility might be a forgotten development instance idling around (or not so much :-D) in the background. I think the default user agent points to txtxt.net, not example.com. At least when I last checked the yarnd code. That was also several months ago.

​ Read More