↳ In-reply-to » And there it is: Another rotation of this feed.

@fastidious@arrakis.netbros.com You don’t. A next field was discussed in the original draft, but then it was discarded. It’s easier to implement without it and you don’t really need it for automated feed retrieval. For manual retrieval, though, it would have been helpful.

It was probably discussed in the pull request – or in some twtxt thread, which I can’t find anymore. 🥴