↳ In-reply-to » I suppose this is probably way down on the priority list, but it'd be useful at times (for me) if yarnc also had a mentions subcommand, since sometimes I'm living in the terminal and read my timeline there.

@prologic@twtxt.net No, I might miss their response because my timeline gets very busy.

Just like threading in other pieces of software, it’d be nice to see a yarn spooled out even if I’m not explicitly mentioned. You explained once before that it got too busy to have everyone who was ever mentioned maintained in the yarn, which makes sense as a design choice. Still, there are times when I’d like to track how the yarn is progressing even if I’m not mentioned anymore.